The Secret Worldwide Transit Cabal |
|
Informed but opinionated commentary and analysis on urban transportation topics from the Secret Worldwide Transit Cabal. Names have been omitted to protect the guilty. Our Mission: Monkeywrench the Anti-Transit Forces
Archives
E-mail: transitcabal -AT- gmail.com (EDIT before sending!) Please report dead links News Sources www.planetizen.com www.lightrail.com www.lightrailnow.org www.funimag.com. Funicular RRs Skepticism/Baloney Detecton Practical Skepticism Site The Fine Art of Baloney Detection (Carl Sagan) www.spinsanity.org Pro-Transit Sites Victoria Transportation Policy Institute Vitriolic Critic of American "Urbanism": www.kunstler.com Protransit Site in Cincinnati Protransit Site in Toronto SeattleMonoJabsAll.pdf Critics / Anti-Transit Sites Prime Transit Disinfo: www.rppi.org Wendell Cox's Website Randal O'Toole: www.ti.org/antiplanner |
Monday, October 21, 2002
Wendell Cox is Not Mediocre -- He's Just Average -- 5 "It is the unfortunate destiny of the ridiculous to be subject to ridicule" James Howard Kunstler From the Cabalmaster: The Secret Worldwide Transit Cabal has just found another example of “weak and lame” on a “Demographia” page: “Japan Cities, Ranked by 1990-2000 Population Change" (see: www.demographia.com/db-japancitych.htm). One important reason why some large Japanese cities have gained population while others have lost it has to do with political boundaries -- and nothing more. Some cities include large tracts of sparsely-populated land (Sapporo, Sendai, Yokohama); others do not (Nagoya, Osaka). You will not find any hint of this on “Demographia.” (The various Japan Prefectural Atlases make excellent “graphic” references; one recent title is “Nippon Bunken Chizu 1999,” Tokyo: Jinbunsha, 1999.) It would be useful if the Denizens of Demoographia would take the time to flag those cities that have annexed land since the time of the “preceding count.” In other words, for Tokyo, "1930-1940*” with the asterisk alerting the reader that the city annexed land between 1930 and 1940. (We wouldn’t suggest holding your breath while waiting for Demographia’s Denizens to make this improvement.)
Comments:
Post a Comment
|