(<$BlogItemCommentCount$>) comments
The Secret Worldwide Transit Cabal

Informed but opinionated commentary and analysis on urban transportation topics from the Secret Worldwide Transit Cabal. Names have been omitted to protect the guilty.

Our Mission: Monkeywrench the Anti-Transit Forces

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Monday, April 28, 2003

 
Things are Getting Hot in Albuquerque

Home of More Transit Links Than You can Possibly Check(tm), Unless you have no life other than websurfing

"Truth passes through three phases: 1) It is ridiculed. 2) It is violently opposed. 3) It is accepted as self-evident." Albert Schopenhouer. In the United States, rail is currently passing through Phase Two.


From the Cabalmaster:

One of the latest cities to announce plans for light rail transit is Albuquerque, New Mexico. In February 2003, Mayor Martin Chavez announced that construction would begin on the first phase in 2006, the 300th anniversary of the city's founding. This is to link Coronado Mall with the downtown Alvarado Transportation Center. The second phase, to be started as early as 2008, will link the airport ("Albuquerque International Sunport") with Albuquerque's West Side. Both lines will operate along Central Avenue. Estimated total cost: $700 million, with 50 percent paid by the Fedeeral Transit Administration. However, the local share has not been secured. Chavez mooted plans for a revenue stream, such as a three-cent per gallon gasoline tax, to back a bond issue. Bus improvements (a "rapid transit bus system") are to be implemented from 2004. albuquerque.bizjournals.com/albuquerque/stories/2003.

The first line, dubbed the "Red Chile Line," is estimated to cost $400 million. It would extend from Coors Boulevard on the West Side to Louisiana Boulevard in Northeast Heights along Central Avenue. It would "probably" include an extension northward along Louisiana Blvd to the Uptown-area shopping malls and businesses.

The second line, estimated to cost $200 million, is dubbed the "Green Chile Line," and would be built mostly on railroad rights of way. It would serve the airport, museums, Old Town and other attractions.

The state legislature is considering two measures to raise the local share. One is a surcharge on motor vehicle registrations within the city; the other is the gas-tax increase. Both would raise about $8.5 million per year. Meanwhile, by April 2004, the Albuquerque Transit Department will begin "super express" bus servcie along the route of the Red Chile Line along Central Avenue. Stops would be spaced about one mile apart. www.abqtrib.com/archives/news03/022703_news_lrail.shtml

(An FOC notes, contrary to the information found in the above article, the Los Angeles Metro Rapid bus services do not use articulated buses, nor does Austin. The Texas capital also does not have traffic signal priority for buses.)

The Albuquerque Rapid Transit Project website is hctp.net.





 
SEATTLE PART 15: IT'S THE WATER . . . AND WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE?

"It is the unfortunate destiny of the ridiculous to be subject to ridicule."
James Howard Kunstler

"Truth passes through three phases: 1) It is ridiculed. 2) It is violently opposed. 3) It is accepted as self-evident." Albert Schopenhouer. In the United States, rail is currently passing through Phase Two.


From the Cabalmaster:

The Secret Worldwide Transit Cabal is pleased to resume its coverage of the wacky, comical and just plain bizarre story of the Seattle monorail project.

Unfortunately we were delayed by DSL problems when some moron cut through our line to the CabalBunker(tm); we don't think it was caused by Wendell "Fudge" Cox (he's living with Saddam in the Paris Metro according to an FOC rumour), nor by angry Monorailistas from Seattle, at least we don't think so... :-)

We're opinionated (that's why you enjoy this blog, eh?), but that's not why Your Favorite Transit Pundits are mono-skeptics. If monorails could do half of what their supporters claim, we'd be the staunchest of supporters. Think of it . . . a massive, sweeping pro-transit, pro-urban revolution . . . No more wars to procure oil, no more spills from ruptured supertankers, no more SUVs . . . ALL POWER TO THE SUBSTATIONS! ( . . . yeah, we know, sometimes we should quit while we're ahead . . .)

The fundamental problem with the Seattle monorail can be explained in ten words or less:

The technology was chosen first. Then the route was selected.

(There, you see, exactly ten words! Ain't it pretty?)

In other words:

--"Say, let's build a Monorail!"
--"OK, so where we gonna put it?"

This is sort of like buying a train set from your local "big-box" retailer, then deciding where to set it up. Except that this particular train set will cost roughly $2 billion, or more. (Or, to paraphrase certain right-wing blogs, "THAT'S $2,000,000,000 PRECIOUS TAX DOLLARS!!!")

Another problem: the planned monorail will not serve any of the "priority" travel corridors identified by more than two decades of planning. (The amount of "precious tax dollars" spent for the various studies is in the tens of millions.)

Instead, the Crown Hill - Ballard -downtown - West Seattle route was outlined explicitly to avoid conflict with the Sound Transit "Central Link" light-rail project -- which does serve one of the priority corridors (two, once funding is secured).

In short, the monorail proposal is totally divorced from anything resembling good planning. (And, so long as planning is required -- as it is by federal law as a condition to receive federal transportation funding -- it might as well be good.)

SEATTLE PART 15: IT'S THE WATER . . . AND WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE?

As just about all intrepid websurfers are well aware, Seattle voters approved the monorail project and a financing plan on November 5, 2002 (. . . a day that will live in . . . yeah, we know, quit while we're ahead).
archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=monoqa24m0&date=20021124&query=monorail
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/96584_monorail21.shtml

You had to be there on Election Night, November 5, 2002. You also had to be there as days turned into weeks, and the outcome of the monorail measure hung in the balance. About all anyone knew for certain was that the "official" certified results had to be ready by November 20, the day before Thanksgiving ("Turkey Day" . . . get it? . . . get it??). For a synopsis of the post-election cliffhanger, see this page on the Monorail Society website: www.monorails.org/tMspages/archive111902.html .

The monorail measure trailed at first in early returns (seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/94429_monorail06.shtml archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=monorail06m&date=20021105&query=monorail). However, monorail supporters were confident, for they had mustered a major 11th-hour ad campaign and "get out the vote" drive. Late on Election Night, the monorail led by 52 percent . . . but this represented about 4,500 votes out of more than 100,000 counted . . . and tens of thousands left to count (archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=monorail06m&date=20021106&query=monorail, picture the scene in Belltown as monorail supporters chanted "Mo-no-rail! Mo-no-rail!"

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/94429_monorail06.shtml; scroll down for an unforgettable view of monorail guru Dick Falkenbury "getting down" at the victory party).

With all polling places reporting on November 6 (Wednesday night), the monorail led by 5,000 votes out of slightly more than 100,000. Then the fun began.

Washington state has a permissive law regarding absentee ballots: ballots need only be postmarked by Election Day. Not only that, but the absentee-ballot mailing was delayed by . . . you guessed it . . . the court-ordered change of title for the monorail ballot measure.

On November 7 (Thursday), the beleaguered King County Election Department was awash in about 190,000 uncounted absentee ballots, with up to 70,000 more thought to be in the mail. Seattle accounts for less than 40 percent of the county's population, so not all of these were "monorail" voters. The "yes" margin eroded as each successive day's count was released.

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/94806_monorail08.shtml

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=votetally08m0&date=20021108&query=monorail

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/95350_monorail13.shtml

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=votetally10m&date=20021110&query=monorail

However, the newspapers did not notice that each successive "tranche" of absentee votes grew less "opposed."

From four digits to three, the slender margin of "yes" votes shrunk, then disappeared, as monorail supporters spread conspiracy theories and tales of missing ballots (no, no, no, a thousand times no, we did not make this up: www.seattleweekly.com/features/0247/news-barnett.php).

Meanwhile, FOCs ruminated on the outcome, and steeled themselves for the worst: ". . . a victory for 'them' could be a victory for 'us' as we watch monorail melt down in front of our eyes . . ." ("Us" and "them"? . . . oh, no, a conspiracy!!!)

The King County Election Department took the Memorial Day weekend off, then resumed counting. On November 14 (Thursday), it announced that the monorail lead had shrank to 329 votes, with about 4,000 more absentee ballot.

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/95350_monorail13.shtml

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=votetally13m&date=20021113&query=monorail

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=webmono14&date=20021114&query=monorail

On November 18 (Monday), out of 184,000 votes counted, the monorail trailed . . . by exactly three votes. Monorail supporters may have spluttered "thousands of beautiful votes and three ugly ones," or something like that.

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/96152_monorail18ww.shtml

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=webmonorail18&date=20021118&query=monorail

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/96273_monorail19.shtml

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=votetally19m&date=20021119&query=monorail

(The gag line ". . . and three ugly ones" . . . is local Seattle humor, inspired by a sign outside a well-known nightclub: "Hundreds of Beautiful Girls And Three Ugly Ones." An FOC reports seeing the following on a florist's shop: "Hundreds of Beautiful Flowers and Three Ugly Ones.")

Then, on November 19 (Thursday), the count reversed abruptly, to an 868-vote "yes" margin out of about 188,000 counted, or 50.2 percent. The reason: the very last ballots counted were so-called "special ballots" and "add-ons," given to people in case of problems: going to the wrong polling place, not appearing on the list of registered voters, and so forth. In other words, those who were determined to vote, come what may. A small number of uncounted votes remained, but not enough to change the outcome.

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/96307_monorail19ww.shtml

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=webmonorail19&date=20021119&query=monorail

Two weeks after the election . . . and the moon was full and bright . . .

(No, we didn't make that last part up, either, although we may plant some wolfsbane at Line's End, the very secret hidden retreat of the Secret Worldwide Transit Cabal, to commemorate the Seattle monorail vote.)

The final count was announced November 20.

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/96425_monorail20.shtml

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=votetally20m&date=20021120&query=monorail

The final "yes" margin was 877 votes.

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=squeakers21m0&date=20021121&query=monorail

An FOC remarked "This project is certain to melt down, just like Three Mile Island." It will be interesting to see how long it takes the public to turn on this project, given the inevitable cost overruns.

Another FOC wanted to nominate this quote from Dick Falkenbury for "understatement of the year:"

"We're not universally loved, and we better prove ourselves." seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/96307_monorail19ww.shtml

(Falkenbury stands a good chance of winning the "understatement of the decade" competition.)

The monorail attracted support along the planned route, but was opposed to greater or lesser extent in most of the rest of the city.

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=monovote25m&date=20021125&query=monorail

However, the plan also drew strong support from voters in precincts well away from the "Green Line," in particular, Capitol Hill, the University District - Ravenna, and Fremont. In fact, most precincts with the highest pro-monorail vote were located well away from the planned line. All this is revealed graphically by an interesting Seattle Times map. seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/local/links/monorailvote25.pdf

We Opinionated Ones are monorail skeptics, but we do pay tribute to the grass-roots effort that brought it about.

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/96401_populist20.shtml

seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/96493_monored.shtml

Even before the outcome was known, the monorail board announced the choice of Joel Horn, on November 16. But it could not take no action because the formal transformation of the Elevated Transportation Company board into the interim Seattle Popular Monorail Authority board awaited the successful outcome of the vote.

archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=monostaff16m&date=20021116&query=monorail

seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/96975_monorail23.shtml

More on monorail personnel matters in our next installment.


Friday, April 18, 2003

 
Baghdad Metro In the News

"It is the unfortunate destiny of the ridiculous to be subject to ridicule."
James Howard Kunstler

"Truth passes through three phases: 1) It is ridiculed. 2) It is violently opposed. 3) It is accepted as self-evident." Albert Schopenhouer. In the United States, rail is currently passing through Phase Two.


From the Cabalmaster:

The fate of the guy with the mustache remains uncertain (we hear that he's holed up at the Bada Bing Club; another report has him, shorn and shaven, at the side of You-Know-Who, munching "pommes-frites de la liberté" (Freedom Fries) in Gay Paree . . . ). However, details have appeared about the unfinished Baghdad Metro.

According to an Iraqi defector described as a former top scientist, the tunnels were used to hide weapons of mass destruction. This story was broadcast on "60 Minutes" in February 2003: www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/02/21/60minutes/main541565.shtml.

A more recent "Washington Post" report (April 2003) includes estimates that Baghdad has up to 100 km of secret tunnels. www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32294-2003Apr4.html

Finding tunnels and bunkers is reported as a priority for US military and intelligence. The Serbian engineering firm BK Aeroinzenjering (in English: Aeroengineering), established under the former Yugoslav Communist regime of Josip Broz Tito, is believed to have built many of Iraq's military tunnels and bunkers.

(Websites: www.aeroinzenjering.co.yu/srpski.html and www.bkgroup.com/BKAeroing in Serbian (Latin alphabet);

www.bkgroup.com/BKAeroing/indexr.htm in Russian;

and www.aeroinzenjering.co.yu/engleski.html in English.)

An AP report dated April 9. 2003 states that US troops have begun combing the tunnel network. www.militarycity.com/iraq/1756855.html (We trust that they'll avoid stray currents from the third rail, which might disrupt night-vision goggles.)

This subways.net page has several interesting links: www.subways.net/iraq/index.htm

Don’t miss the great graphic, "Saddam and George holding peace conferences while touring a station on the Baghdad Metro," at the bottom of the page.

(By the way: the red-white-black Iraqi flag is the "pre-war" version, including the "takbir" (Allahu Akbar, "God is Great") in the calligraphy of the guy with the mustache. flagspot.net/flags/iq.html The supermarket tabloid Weekly World News is sponsoring a contest to design a new Iraqi flag www.weeklyworldnews.com/news/index.cfm?instanceid=57213.

A British rail enthusiast has gathered information about the railways of Iraq www.ajg41.clara.co.uk/iraqrailways.html and Afghanistan www.ajg41.clara.co.uk/afghanistan.html

See www.metropla.net for a transit-related war protest message.

As a reminder that some of the details found in the links above may be less than credible, we're including the following, to a 1991 article by a British journalist, stating that Iraq successfully tested a nuclear bomb in 1989, at a secret underground site 150 km southwest of Baghdad.

See www.atour.com/news/international/20010227a.html (We Opinionated Ones are frankly agnostic about this particular story -- we'll believe it when we see more details.)

An important detail not known to the Secret Worldwide Transit Cabal: whether any of Baghdad's "secret tunnels" are suitable for conversion to transit use. They may have been built with, grades too steep or curves too sharp, or clearances inadequate for operation of subway trains. So far, only the U.S. Army and U.S. Marines know for sure.

Remember: you read about the Bagdag Metro first on our blog! We'll bring you additional details as they become available.



 
We're Baaacckkk OR Another Sneak Attack by, well, Mr. Fudge?

"It is the unfortunate destiny of the ridiculous to be subject to ridicule."
James Howard Kunstler

"Truth passes through three phases: 1) It is ridiculed. 2) It is violently opposed. 3) It is accepted as self-evident." Albert Schopenhouer. In the United States, rail is currently passing through Phase Two.


From the Cabalmaster:

Another Sneak Attack by, well, Mr. Fudge?

No, but it sure seemed that way as we struggled to "unstick" (so to speak) our "works" after moving to our new (and very secret) World Headquarters. (Sometimes it seemed as if one of Wendell's secret agents had taken a pair of scissors to our the DSL line connecting our network!)